Left school at 14
HANDS up all those of you who hated school and wished you
could have left at 14.

According to the former chief inspector of schools Chris Woodhead
you'd have been better off out at work, learning a trade.
He's urging the Government to cut the school-leaving age to 14. "It
is a common sense solution to a growing problem,"
Mr Woodhead said. "There is a significant minority who will have
made as much progress as they are going to by the time they reach
14. Often, for them, going to school is a waste of time. It involves
ritual humiliation for them and they know they are no good in an academic
sense.
"They would be better off in the workptace learning something
they are good at or something they enjoy."
Mr Woodhead would only attach two conditions - that they had achieved
basic standards of literacy and numeracy and had a job already lined
up. He says forcing them to stay on studying subjects in which they
have not the slightest interest or the faintest aptitude for is a
recipe for truancy and classroom disruption.
Let them go out to work and free up teachers to teach those who want
to be taught. "There are many who think that it is best to keep
people in education for as long as possible. But there is no economic
argument to back that up. "In this country we are desperately
short of tradesmen and craftsmen. It is not all about getting people
into university, getting them degrees for the so-called knowledge
economy, which the Government seems obsessed with." Amen to that.
Britain is short of at least 120,000 skilled craftsmen, such as plumbers,
bricklayers and electricians. There's good money to be made for anyone
willing to buckle down and learn a trade. But a friend of mine, a
foreman in a big building firm, says they can't recruit apprentices
for love nor money. Kids are turning out of schools thinking they
should be free to "express themselves". And that means not
getting their hands dirty. No one appears to have told them the world
doesn't owe them a living. So they take the easy option, drift into
worthless courses and phoney "training" schemes and end
up on the dole, flipping burgers or dealing drugs. Not that there's
anything wrong with flipping burgers. Someone's got to do it. But
how many youngsters spending their days asking if you'd like fries
with that would have made excellent chippies or plasterers? Plenty
of my contemporaries left school at 15, learned a trade and are now
doing very nicely, thank you, many of them running their own successful
companies.
This Government could be doing much more to promote proper skills
and create a new generation of talented craftsmen and engineers is.by
cutting the school leaving age and encouraging apprenticeship schemes,
through generous tax incentives and grants.
But it would rather youngsters lolled around for years filling their
heads with drivel on worthless "degree" courses in bogus
" universities. The only thing they're qualified for at the end
of it is one of those ludicrous non-jobs out of The Guardian. Or flipping
burgers. So, guess what. They join the transphobic harassment outreach
diversity co-ordinating classes, where they become an expensive drain
on society rather than useful, productive, wealth-creating members.
The real purpose of New Labour's "education, education, education"
is "indoctrination, indoctrination, indoctrination". They
want to churn out millions more people like them - bureaucrats, social
workers, "human rights" activists, researchers, monitors,
inspectors, lecturers.
In other words, a bunch of gormless, self-righteous losers on the
public payroll who can be guaranteed never to vote Tory. Old Labour
wanted to build the Conservatives out of power by covering the country
with council estates.
New Labour intends to stay in power by carpeting the country with
council employees. Not dustmen, or parkies, or roadsweepers, mind
you. But people like them - Guardianistas or a party built on the
political subscriptions of trades union members - electricians, engineers,
boilermakers, shipyard mechanics, toolmakers - New Labour has a snobbish
disregard for manual labour. They seem to think true fulfilment can
only be found by sitting on a sub-committee, or setting targets in
triplicate, or defending the "human rights" of terrorists
and paedophiles, on legal aid.
The trouble with tradesmen, especially those who go on to become self-employed
and run their own companies, is that they have an alarming tendency
to think for themselves, instead of signing up for the whole Guardianista
agenda. And what they don't want is government interference, regulatian
or high taxation - the lifeblood of this Government New Labour wants
peopIe on the public teat so it can frighten them with the prospect
of "Tory cuts" come election time.
This Government is obsessed with "human rights". But what
greater human right can there be than to give someone a chance to
fufil their potential, to develop valuable skills, to hold down a
proper iob, earn a decent wage and make a full contribution to society?
And if that means letting them leave school at 14, so be it.